|

          
|
If these buttons don't work, try
using the links
at the foot of the page
|
|

SOCIAL SERVICES NORTH WEST (NWASSA)
MEETING ON 15 JUNE 2001 AT TAMESIDE
REPORT OF THE CO-ORDINATOR
WORKING WITH THE NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE
1. Matter for Consideration:
To consider how to respond to proposals from the new Government
about the further reform of the National Health Service and
related social care services.
- Introduction:
Social Services North West undertook considerable activity in
this area of work during the autumn and winter of 2000-01,
including a major conference and a second meeting with the
Regional Chair of the NHS Executive. In the pre-election period
this matter has been somewhat in abeyance whilst other priorities
are addressed, but it seems certain that the new Government will
proceed with further rapid, and possibly radical, change in the
NHS. It will therefore be necessary to consider promptly and
carefully the impact of such proposals on the delivery of social
care by councils.
3. Information:
3.1 The Health and Social Care Bill has been progressing through
Parliament through the Spring: this needed to be brought to a
swift conclusion in view of the dissolution of Parliament at the
beginning of May. Whilst all the provisions for the abolition of
Community Health Councils were withdrawn from the Bill, the new
role for local authority overview and scrutiny committees in
scrutinising the health service were retained. This provision was
supported in both Houses and unchallenged by the Lords amendments.
Also retained were the duty of NHS bodies to consult the public
and the duty for the Secretary of State to provide for an
independent advocacy service. Clearly there will be some confusion
to be resolved here, as the legislation provides for new
arrangements for public and patient representation without
removing CHCs. The LGA has suggested that local authorities will
need to start discussion with all local relevant partners,
including other local councils, CHCs and health bodies, about what
arrangements will work best locally, to ensure that there are
effective and efficient mechanisms for scrutinising local health
services and for improving the local health economy.
3.2 The provisions in the Health and Social Care bill in
relation to Care Trusts were amended in a number of respects which
are significant to local government. Ministers have confirmed that
Care Trusts will be NHS bodies, but local authorities will
nominate members for the board. Lord Hunt also confirmed that
"Care Trusts will be voluntary partnerships and will simply
not go ahead unless the accountability and governance arrangements
are right." These would cover:
- the extent to which Care Trust boards will be able to make
policy decisions about the delegated local authority services
and when they must seek Local Authority consent;
- performance management arrangements to enable the local
authority to ensure that the delegated functions are carried
out appropriately;
- how the Care Trust will be able to feed into local authority
decisions on charging and budget setting in relation to
delegated services.
3.3 The Minister also gave explicit assurances that Care Trusts
will:
- have dual accountability to the NHS and the local authority
- have the local authority representatives selected by the
local authority subject only to a probity check by the
independent appointments commission;
- have the number of local authority representatives decided
by local agreement;
- be able to draw up their own accountability and governance
arrangements within a flexible national framework.
3.4 The LGA is continuing to work with the Department of Health on
developing the detailed governance and accountability arrangements
for these new bodies. It is also arranging a conference on
"The new Government and Health: putting Local Government at
the centre of the health agenda", to be held in London on 30
July. Delegates will hear about the new Government's health
agenda. Speakers will give concrete examples as to how local
authorities can take the lead in local partnerships, tackle health
inequalities and include health gain measures in an SRB bid. There
will be workshops on partnership between local government and
health, tackling health inequalities by developing stress
indicators and by developing a new local accountability in the NHS.
3.5 Clearly the next few months will be crucial in shaping the
future pattern of governance and management in health and social
care. It is suggested that Social Services North West needs to
maintain its top level liaison with the Regional Office of the NHS,
and there may also be benefits in developing links at regional
level with the CHC movement about public and patient
representation and scrutiny of the NHS. Members may also wish to
ensure that the North West is well represented at the LGA
conference on 30 July, and that, depending on the pace of national
developments, a further regional event be considered for the
autumn.
4. Recommendation:
4.1 That the report be noted.
4.2 That continuing periodic high-level meetings between the
Regional Office of the NHS Executive and Social Services North
West be maintained.
4.3 That contact be made with the CHC movement at regional level
to address issues of public and patient representation and
scrutiny of the NHS.
4.4 That further consideration be given to how, through Care
Trusts and other mechanisms, local authorities and NHS
organisations can build on present joint arrangements for the
benefit of service users and carers in their local communities.
|