|

          
|
If these buttons don't work, try
using the links
at the foot of the page
|
|

SOCIAL SERVICES NORTH WEST
MEETING ON 21 DECEMBER 2001 AT WARRINGTON
REPORT OF THE CO-ORDINATOR
WORKING WITH THE NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE
1. Matter for Consideration:
To report on developments in relation to Involving Patients and
the Public in Healthcare and the formation of three large Health
Authorities covering this region.
2. Introduction:
At the last meeting, it was reported in a tabled supplementary
report that the Department of Health had just published two
further key papers, the first being a discussion document on Involving
Patients and the Public in Healthcare. This represented a
considerable advance on the previous proposals for replacing
Community Health Council with two kinds of body which each had
only limited scope: the PALS and Patients Forums. The second paper
was entitled Shifting the Balance of Power within the NHS:
Creating Strategic Health Authorities. It was decided
that responses should be made by Social Services North West to
each of these documents.
3. Information:
3.1 In his reply to Involving Patients and the Public in
Healthcare (Appendix 1)
SSNW Chair Councillor Cliff Morris welcomed the principles and aims
around public and patient empowerment which were set out in the
document. We had two key concerns about the means of delivering
these aims. The first was that the PALS and Patients Forums would
sit inside rather than outside the operational organisations of the
NHS. Secondly, whilst we welcomed the concept of VOICE organisations
across the country, they could not truly be described as ‘local’
if they functioned only at Strategic Health Authority level. We
therefore urged the Government to create many more local VOICE
organisations, each serving only a small number of health economies
and local authorities. They would be able to co-ordinate all the
levels of patient and public involvement to which we are all
committed. They would also be the suitable vehicle to employ the
staff of the PALS and the Patients Forums. We stressed that we are
keenly interested in ensuring that the NHS and local social services
authorities work effectively together to serve local people.
3.2 In November, Hazel Blears, Under Secretary for Health and MP
for Salford, acknowledged our contribution and many others to the
debate (see Appendix 2), and
published the Government’s Response to the Listening Exercise. Key
proposals now were:
- Give the new Commission for Patient and Public Involvement in
Health the power to set up local networks, to provide local as
well as national support. The Commission will be able to operate
some of its functions at PCT level; and for each local network
to use a number of community-based premises from which outreach
teams can work for the benefit of local people and build on
existing local work.
- Make the Commission an independent statutory body.
Local network staff will be directly accountable to the
Commission centrally, but will also have local lay reference
panels to steer their work programme. To increase lay input, we
will also give PCT Patients’ Forums collectively the power to
attend Strategic Health Authority Board meetings.
- Ensure co-ordination through the Commission’s local
networks. Given the independent status of the Commission’s
local networks, with responsibility for commissioning ICAS,
supporting Patients Forums and informing Overview and Scrutiny
Committees across the area, they are ideally placed to act as
the "glue" which binds together all the other elements
of the new arrangements
- Simplify the system under the umbrella of the Commission,
which, as well as fulfilling national functions, will now employ
local teams which will promote and facilitate involving the
public in local decisions that affect their health.
- Draw membership for the Commission from Patients’ Forums and
Local Strategic Partnership lay members and others, in
particular from the voluntary sector. In addition to original
responsibilities around standard-setting, training and
evaluation, it will be given a strengthened role to report
matters of concern on issues of patients’ safety and welfare
to bodies in a position to take action, for example CHI and the
National Patients Safety Agency.
- The Commission will also produce an annual report highlighting
its findings for the benefit of Parliament and the Secretary of
State for Health.
- Use the NHS Appointments Commission to set the criteria and
process for appointment to Patients’ Forums, to ensure
transparency, but to make membership subject to very broad and
inclusive criteria. Lay reference panels for local networks of
the Commission will be charged with making the appointments to
Patients’ Forums. The local network staff will then provide
support for Patients’ Forums in their work.
- We will also rename PALS as Patient Advice and Liaison
Services, and to make the Commission responsible, through its
local networks, for commissioning ICAS.
3.3 These proposals represent a further welcome advance, in that
they strengthen the local machinery considerably and provide
important independent elements at the local level. It will however
be a complex and demanding structure, demanding considerable skills
from its staff, not all of which are readily available within the
NHS at present. The intention is to introduce the new arrangements
fully by April 2003 but clearly much preparatory work will be
needed. In view of the close involvement of member authorities, both
as partners of the local NHS and as hosts of the Overview and
Scrutiny Committees which have a key role, members may feel that
Social Services North West should continue to work with regional
partners to further shape the development of these structures in the
North West.
3.4 The second document Shifting the Balance of Power
within the NHS: Creating Strategic Health Authorities was
swiftly followed by consultation documents on the formation
of new Health Authorities for Cheshire and Merseyside, Cumbria and
Lancashire and Greater Manchester. Key points made by Chair Cliff
Morris in responding to the consultations (Appendices 3,
4 and 5)
included:
- We particularly welcome the commitments to supporting delivery
at the front line, and to encouraging partnerships in health and
local government to ensure integration between health and social
care. These are commitments which we share.
- The rapid and radical change in the management of the NHS was
bound to lead to instability, but it remains as essential as
ever for us all to remain focussed on the need to maintain
adequate delivery in the short term, as well as to improve
delivery in the longer term.
- We welcome the development of Primary Care Trusts and support
the three key roles identified for them in the document:
Improving the Health of the Community, Securing the Provision of
Services, and Integrating Health and Social Care. Our member
authorities see the emerging PCTs as their primary partners at
local level, and are committed to developing ever closer working
relationships between health and social care.
- Our member authorities are involved in (and often leading) a
rapidly increasing number of joint projects using Health Act
flexibilities, and joint managerial appointments for key areas
of service. We see such voluntary partnerships as key to the
successful integration of health and social care at the point of
delivery to service users. In this context, we welcome the
document's recognition that Care Trusts will have a role
"where local partners agree."
- In relation to Strategic Health Authorities in general, we
accept the case for an organisational tier in the NHS at
conurbation/sub-regional level. We also accept the three key
roles envisaged for them: Creating a coherent strategic
framework, Performance Management of local NHS organisations,
and Supporting Improvement. As agreed with your colleagues
earlier this year, we look forward to developing a working
relationship with the Chairs and Chief Executives of the three
Strategic Health Authorities to be established in the North
West.
- We have reservations about the role of the Regional Directors
of Health and Social Care, which as yet is insufficiently
defined in relation to the Social Services Inspectorate and
autonomous local authorities. We shall watch developments with
interest.
- Our member authorities, and Social Services North West as a
body, look forward to further developing our joint work with the
NHS, both locally through the PCTs and at the level of the
Strategic Health Authorities. In this way, we shall all be able
to play our part in further improving the health and wellbeing
of the people of the North West.
3.5 Clearly the rapid pace of change in the organisation of the
NHS is continuing, and Social Services North West will need to make
contact at appropriate points in the new structure. Particularly,
members may wish contact to be made with the new Regional Director
for Health and Social Care, and with the Chairs and Chief Executives
of the three new Strategic Health Authorities being set up in the
North West.
4. Recommendations:
4.1 That this report be noted and the responses made on behalf
of Social Services North West be endorsed
4.2 That further work be undertaken with appropriate partners
on Involving Patients and the Public in Healthcare
4.3 That contact be made with the new Regional Director for
Health and Social Care, and with the Chairs and Chief Executives
of the three new Strategic Health Authorities being set up in the
North West, seeking appropriate meetings
4.4 That a further conference on health issues, possibly with
NHS partners, be held in the Spring of 2002
4.5 That a further report be presented to the next meeting
Appendix 1: Reply to the
Consultation on Involving Patients and the Public in Healthcare
Appendix 2: Reply of Hazel
Blears, Under Secretary of State
Appendix
3: Reply to the Consultation on the proposal to establish a new
Health Authority for Cheshire and Merseyside
Appendix
4: Reply to the Consultation on the proposal to establish a new
Health Authority for Cumbria and Lancashire
Appendix
5: Reply to the Consultation on the proposal to establish a new
Health Authority for Greater Manchester
|