|

          
|
If these buttons don't work, try
using the links
at the foot of the page
|
|

POLICY PAPERS - NOVEMBER 2001
Social Services North West is the member-level body which
represents the local authorities in the North West of England which
have responsibility for the personal social services. 18 of the 21
eligible authorities are in membership.
Social Services North West works with its members and others to
promote high quality local authority services in the North West of
England by:
- considering issues relating to the personal social services
which are of regional or sub-regional significance, and making
recommendations to member authorities
- promoting good practice in the personal social services
amongst member authorities
- making representations to Government on behalf of member
authorities on the implications for the North West of Government
policies for the personal social services and related matters
- working with other regional and national bodies on behalf of
member authorities to promote high quality public services
Social Services North West reviewed its work programme in
September 2001. As a result, it has identified four key issues to
place at the centre of its Annual Work Programme 2001/02. We have taken stock of where we stand on each of the four issues.
In each case, we spell out in the following papers: what we stand
for; what we have done; what our experience tells us; and what
action we are pressing for.
The four topics are dealt with in turn below, or you can click on
the links to go direct to the topic you are interested in.
Social Services North West
Policy Papers - November 2001
WORKING WITH THE NHS
What we stand for
We recognise the National Health Service as our principal
partner in delivering high-quality care to vulnerable people
We work in partnership with NHS organisations locally and
regionally to achieve the best possible outcome for those needing
services
We believe that such progress is best achieved through voluntary
partnerships rather than enforced organisational change
What we have done
- We have continued the long-established dialogue with the NHS
at regional level
- With NHS North West, we have sent strong joint messages to all
NHS and social services organisations on the need for
partnership working
- We held a major conference in January 2001 on Social Care and
the NHS Plan
- Many member authorities are voluntarily building closer
partnerships and joint provision with their local NHS
counterparts
- We made links with the regional organisation for CHCs;
undertaken a joint service with them and responded to the DH
consultation on Involving Patients
- We replied to the DH document on Shifting the Balance of
Power within the NHS - Securing Delivery, and are committed
to working with the reformed NHS
What our experience tells us
- Extra resources allocated to the NHS to cope with such issues
as winter capacity and intermediate care are not always
addressing the total health/social care system
- Rapid organisational change in the NHS is inhibiting its
capacity to address both planning and operational issues on a
partnership basis
- Local joint action at the interface between health and social
care is best achieved through voluntary arrangements tailored to
local circumstances
- The improved proposals for Involving Patients and the
Public in Healthcare need further work to ensure they mesh
effectively with local authority arrangements
What action we are pressing for
- In a spirit of partnership with the NHS, we continue to expect
to be treated as equals in the single health and social care
system, regionally and locally
- We will seek a partnership with the three new Strategic Health
Authorities in the region as soon as they are formed
- We will do further work on Involving Patients and the
Public in Healthcare
- We are convinced that voluntary partnerships are the way
forward to integrating health and social care, and reject
enforced organisational change
Back to top of page
Social Services North West
Policy Papers - November 2000
FINANCIAL ISSUES
What we stand for
- We acknowledge the need to use the resources available for the
personal social services economically, efficiently and
effectively
- We believe it to be our duty, however, to highlight the fact
that many member authorities are contending with increased
demand for services, and continue to face budget reductions
beyond those which can be met by efficiency savings
What we have done
- In each of the past two years, and jointly with the ADSS North
West Branch, we have undertaken a survey of the financial
situation in all 21 North West authorities
- We have shared the findings with Ministers and with the LGA,
and have received some recognition of our concerns
What our experience tells us
Key findings of our summer 2001 survey were:
- A real problem of structural under-funding with social
services authorities finding it increasingly difficult to meet
their statutory obligations.
- Across the region, expenditure was expected to be some £21
million (or 1.5 %) in excess of that budgeted for the financial
year 2000/01.
- Most authorities reported that last year's ‘Winter Pressures’
was significant in reducing delayed discharges, but longer term,
more certain funding was urgently needed
- Pressures on the budget due to the rising costs and demand for
placements, especially for foster care and children with
disabilities
- A gap between the cost of meeting all expected demand which
falls within existing eligibility criteria in 2001/02 and the
budget available.
- Rising costs and demands in the adult care sector were
highlighted by half the respondents.
What action we are pressing for
- We urge Central Government to recognise that financial
pressures are still causing real cuts in vital services and
restrictions in eligibility criteria, as well as efficiency
savings
- Increased funding to the NHS must be matched with resources to
address the consequences for the social care system of increased
NHS activity
- Continued attention is needed to the management of the
specific grant regime
- We will highlight that achievement of efficiency savings can
often conflict with the wider social objectives of local
authorities eg lower pay and conditions can conflict with social
inclusion objectives
Back to top of page
Social Services North West
Policy Papers - November 2001
QUALITY PROTECTS AND CHILDREN’S ISSUES
What we stand for
- We aim for the highest possible quality of service to children
in need and their families, and recognise the need for
innovative multi-agency approaches
- We support the Quality Protects initiative and related work to
improve standards
- We believe children's services are seriously underfunded at
the present time
What we have done
- We have worked at regional level for 30 years to promote the
care of children
- We have updated our directory of high-quality residential
resources
- We have committed ourselves to cross-agency and cross-service
approaches through the QP Reference Group
- We have initiated action jointly with ADSS NW to maximise
co-operation amongst member authorities in sharing good
practice; in ensuring high-quality, cost-effective residential
placements which meet the specific needs of children and young
people; and in securing Best Value
What our experience tells us
- Regionally, as well as locally and nationally, the number of
children looked after continues to increase, leading to great
pressure on social services budgets
- The recruitment, development and retention of skilled child
care staff is an increasing problem in developing high-quality
services
- The commissioning of external placements is an ongoing problem
for many authorities
What action we are pressing for
- We will continue to encourage and support member authorities
in improving the standards of their services to children in need
and their families
- We will continue to support the development of good practice
in foster care
- We will continue to identify high quality residential
resources of value to the region
- We will work with ADSS NW to maximise co-operation amongst
member authorities in all instances where this will bring
benefits
- We urge recognition of the financial pressure on authorities
of meeting increased demand and expectations of quality, in a
context of staff and skill shortages
Back to top of page
Social Services North West
Policy Papers - November 2000
LEARNING DISABILITY
What we stand for
We share the commitment in the Valuing People White Paper
to the four key principles of civil rights, independence, choice
and inclusion for people with a learning disability
- We support member authorities to take all necessary action to
protect vulnerable adults from abuse, in accordance with the No
Secrets guidance
- We recognise that this can only be achieved through
partnership working across a broad range of public services and
the wider local community.
What we have done
- For over 10 years to 1999, we worked jointly with the NHS
across the region to resettle all long-stay hospital residents
and enable them to lead ordinary lives in local communities
- We have encouraged member authorities to continue supporting
the North West Training and Development Team which helps promote
high-quality outcomes for people through policy advice,
development projects, consultancy and training
- We promoted a joint conference with SSI and NHS North West to
examine with Health colleagues the Valuing People White
Paper and the No Secrets guidance
What our experience tells us
- Great strides have been made by member authorities, working
with local partners, in improving services to people with
learning disabilities and their carers
- Much further progress remains to be made, with the full
engagement of service users and their carers in the planning and
implementation process
What action we are pressing for
- We welcome the new impetus given by the Valuing People
White Paper, and encourage member authorities to commit fully to
the implementation programme
- We will work with related organisations at regional level to
support local implementation
- We shall press for recognition of the resource implications of
the Government's change proposals, which have been
insufficiently recognised to date
Back to top of page
|